XYZ-110: Cherrypicking changes from release-4.7 to master (#8254)

* Cherry-picking 7b2861de3a to master because enterprise/master has code in it that enterprise/release-4.7 does not, and I don't want enterprise/master to break the next time somebody merges enterprise/release-4.7 to enterprise/master

* Renamed file to match existing scheme

(cherry picked from commit 8c22c5c6c6)
Этот коммит содержится в:
Jonathan
2018-02-13 15:17:29 -05:00
коммит произвёл Joram Wilander
родитель 5c560db810
Коммит bf1fdf92c7
6 изменённых файлов: 45 добавлений и 32 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().LogJoinEvent(user.Id, channel.Id, joinTime))
// case 1: user joins and leaves the channel before the export period begins
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 0)
// case 2: user joins the channel after the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Nil(t, channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 3: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().LogLeaveEvent(user.Id, channel.Id, leaveTime))
// case 4: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 5: user joins the channel after the export period begins, and leaves the channel before the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 6: user has joined and left the channel long before the export period begins
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 0)
}
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
// the past, even though the time that they were actually in the channel doesn't necessarily overlap with the export period
// case 1: user joins and leaves the channel before the export period begins
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, joinTime-100, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 2: user joins the channel after the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, joinTime+500, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 3: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, joinTime+500, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 4: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime-100, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 5: user joins the channel after the export period begins, and leaves the channel before the export period ends
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime+100, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
// case 6: user has joined and left the channel long before the export period begins
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ func testPermanentDeleteBatch(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().LogJoinEvent(user2.Id, channel.Id, joinTime))
// in between the join time and the leave time, both users were members of the channel
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 2)
// the permanent delete should delete at least one record
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ func testPermanentDeleteBatch(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
assert.NotEqual(t, int64(0), rowsDeleted)
// after the delete, there should be one less member in the channel
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
assert.Equal(t, user2.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
}