XYZ-110: Cherrypicking changes from release-4.7 to master (#8254)
* Cherry-picking7b2861de3ato master because enterprise/master has code in it that enterprise/release-4.7 does not, and I don't want enterprise/master to break the next time somebody merges enterprise/release-4.7 to enterprise/master * Renamed file to match existing scheme (cherry picked from commit8c22c5c6c6)
Этот коммит содержится в:
коммит произвёл
Joram Wilander
родитель
5c560db810
Коммит
bf1fdf92c7
@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().LogJoinEvent(user.Id, channel.Id, joinTime))
|
||||
|
||||
// case 1: user joins and leaves the channel before the export period begins
|
||||
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 2: user joins the channel after the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Nil(t, channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 3: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().LogLeaveEvent(user.Id, channel.Id, leaveTime))
|
||||
|
||||
// case 4: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 5: user joins the channel after the export period begins, and leaves the channel before the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMemberHistory(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 6: user has joined and left the channel long before the export period begins
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
// the past, even though the time that they were actually in the channel doesn't necessarily overlap with the export period
|
||||
|
||||
// case 1: user joins and leaves the channel before the export period begins
|
||||
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-500, joinTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, joinTime-100, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 2: user joins the channel after the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, joinTime+500, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 3: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, joinTime+500, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, joinTime+500, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 4: user joins the channel before the export period begins, but has not yet left the channel when the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+100, leaveTime-100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime-100, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 5: user joins the channel after the export period begins, and leaves the channel before the export period ends
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime-100, leaveTime+100, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ func testGetUsersInChannelAtChannelMembers(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, leaveTime+100, *channelMembers[0].LeaveTime)
|
||||
|
||||
// case 6: user has joined and left the channel long before the export period begins
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(leaveTime+100, leaveTime+200, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, channel.Id, channelMembers[0].ChannelId)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ func testPermanentDeleteBatch(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().LogJoinEvent(user2.Id, channel.Id, joinTime))
|
||||
|
||||
// in between the join time and the leave time, both users were members of the channel
|
||||
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers := store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 2)
|
||||
|
||||
// the permanent delete should delete at least one record
|
||||
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ func testPermanentDeleteBatch(t *testing.T, ss store.Store) {
|
||||
assert.NotEqual(t, int64(0), rowsDeleted)
|
||||
|
||||
// after the delete, there should be one less member in the channel
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistory)
|
||||
channelMembers = store.Must(ss.ChannelMemberHistory().GetUsersInChannelDuring(joinTime+10, leaveTime-10, channel.Id)).([]*model.ChannelMemberHistoryResult)
|
||||
assert.Len(t, channelMembers, 1)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, user2.Id, channelMembers[0].UserId)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ссылка в новой задаче
Block a user