use markdown parsing to identify mentions (#8139)
Этот коммит содержится в:
Chris
коммит произвёл
Harrison Healey
Harrison Healey
родитель
b34384dbad
Коммит
3dad632043
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ import (
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/model"
|
||||
"github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/utils"
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -82,147 +84,229 @@ func TestGetExplicitMentions(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
id2 := model.NewId()
|
||||
id3 := model.NewId()
|
||||
|
||||
// not mentioning anybody
|
||||
message := "this is a message"
|
||||
keywords := map[string][]string{}
|
||||
if mentions, potential, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 0 || len(potential) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("shouldn't have mentioned anybody or have any potencial mentions")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning a user that doesn't exist
|
||||
message = "this is a message for @user"
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("shouldn't have mentioned user that doesn't exist")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning one person
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @user")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning one person without an @mention
|
||||
message = "this is a message for @user"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"this": {id1}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned this")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning multiple people with one word
|
||||
message = "this is a message for @user"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1, id2}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @user")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning only one of multiple people
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}, "@mention": {id2}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @user and not @mention")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning multiple people with multiple words
|
||||
message = "this is an @mention for @user"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}, "@mention": {id2}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @user and @mention")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning @channel (not a special case, but it's good to double check)
|
||||
message = "this is an message for @channel"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@channel": {id1, id2}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @channel")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning @all (not a special case, but it's good to double check)
|
||||
message = "this is an message for @all"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@all": {id1, id2}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @all")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning user.period without mentioning user (PLT-3222)
|
||||
message = "user.period doesn't complicate things at all by including periods in their username"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"user.period": {id1}, "user": {id2}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user.period and not user")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning a potential out of channel user
|
||||
message = "this is an message for @potential and @user"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}}
|
||||
if mentions, potential, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || len(potential) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user and have a potential not in channel")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// words in inline code shouldn't trigger mentions
|
||||
message = "`this shouldn't mention @channel at all`"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("@channel in inline code shouldn't cause a mention")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// words in code blocks shouldn't trigger mentions
|
||||
message = "```\nthis shouldn't mention @channel at all\n```"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("@channel in code block shouldn't cause a mention")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Markdown-formatted text that isn't code should trigger mentions
|
||||
message = "*@aaa @bbb @ccc*"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 3 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] || !mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned all 3 users", mentions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = "**@aaa @bbb @ccc**"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 3 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] || !mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned all 3 users")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = "~~@aaa @bbb @ccc~~"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 3 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] || !mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned all 3 users")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = "### @aaa"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] || mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've only mentioned aaa")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = "> @aaa"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] || mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've only mentioned aaa")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = ":smile:"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) == 1 || mentions[id1] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should not mentioned smile")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = "smile"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] || mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've only mentioned smile")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = ":smile"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] || mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've only mentioned smile")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message = "smile:"
|
||||
keywords = map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}}
|
||||
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] || mentions[id3] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've only mentioned smile")
|
||||
for name, tc := range map[string]struct {
|
||||
Message string
|
||||
Keywords map[string][]string
|
||||
Expected *ExplicitMentions
|
||||
}{
|
||||
"Nobody": {
|
||||
Message: "this is a message",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"NonexistentUser": {
|
||||
Message: "this is a message for @user",
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
OtherPotentialMentions: []string{"user"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"OnePerson": {
|
||||
Message: "this is a message for @user",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"OnePersonWithoutAtMention": {
|
||||
Message: "this is a message for @user",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"this": {id1}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
OtherPotentialMentions: []string{"user"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"MultiplePeopleWithOneWord": {
|
||||
Message: "this is a message for @user",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@user": {id1, id2}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"OneOfMultiplePeople": {
|
||||
Message: "this is a message for @user",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}, "@mention": {id2}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"MultiplePeopleWithMultipleWords": {
|
||||
Message: "this is an @mention for @user",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}, "@mention": {id2}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Channel": {
|
||||
Message: "this is an message for @channel",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@channel": {id1, id2}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
ChannelMentioned: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"All": {
|
||||
Message: "this is an message for @all",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@all": {id1, id2}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
AllMentioned: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UserWithPeriod": {
|
||||
Message: "user.period doesn't complicate things at all by including periods in their username",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"user.period": {id1}, "user": {id2}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"PotentialOutOfChannelUser": {
|
||||
Message: "this is an message for @potential and @user",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
OtherPotentialMentions: []string{"potential"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"InlineCode": {
|
||||
Message: "`this shouldn't mention @channel at all`",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"FencedCodeBlock": {
|
||||
Message: "```\nthis shouldn't mention @channel at all\n```",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Emphasis": {
|
||||
Message: "*@aaa @bbb @ccc*",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
id3: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"StrongEmphasis": {
|
||||
Message: "**@aaa @bbb @ccc**",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
id3: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Strikethrough": {
|
||||
Message: "~~@aaa @bbb @ccc~~",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
id2: true,
|
||||
id3: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Heading": {
|
||||
Message: "### @aaa",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"BlockQuote": {
|
||||
Message: "> @aaa",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"@aaa": {id1}, "@bbb": {id2}, "@ccc": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Emoji": {
|
||||
Message: ":smile:",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"NotEmoji": {
|
||||
Message: "smile",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UnclosedEmoji": {
|
||||
Message: ":smile",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UnopenedEmoji": {
|
||||
Message: "smile:",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{"smile": {id1}, "smiley": {id2}, "smiley_cat": {id3}},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
MentionedUserIds: map[string]bool{
|
||||
id1: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"IndentedCodeBlock": {
|
||||
Message: " this shouldn't mention @channel at all",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"LinkTitle": {
|
||||
Message: `[foo](this "shouldn't mention @channel at all")`,
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"MalformedInlineCode": {
|
||||
Message: "`this should mention @channel``",
|
||||
Keywords: map[string][]string{},
|
||||
Expected: &ExplicitMentions{
|
||||
ChannelMentioned: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
} {
|
||||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
m := GetExplicitMentions(tc.Message, tc.Keywords)
|
||||
if tc.Expected.MentionedUserIds == nil {
|
||||
tc.Expected.MentionedUserIds = make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.EqualValues(t, tc.Expected, m)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -268,170 +352,24 @@ func TestGetExplicitMentionsAtHere(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for message, shouldMention := range cases {
|
||||
if _, _, hereMentioned, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, nil); hereMentioned && !shouldMention {
|
||||
if m := GetExplicitMentions(message, nil); m.HereMentioned && !shouldMention {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("shouldn't have mentioned @here with \"%v\"", message)
|
||||
} else if !hereMentioned && shouldMention {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("should've have mentioned @here with \"%v\"", message)
|
||||
} else if !m.HereMentioned && shouldMention {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("should've mentioned @here with \"%v\"", message)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// mentioning @here and someone
|
||||
id := model.NewId()
|
||||
if mentions, potential, hereMentioned, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions("@here @user @potential", map[string][]string{"@user": {id}}); !hereMentioned {
|
||||
if m := GetExplicitMentions("@here @user @potential", map[string][]string{"@user": {id}}); !m.HereMentioned {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @here with \"@here @user\"")
|
||||
} else if len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id] {
|
||||
} else if len(m.MentionedUserIds) != 1 || !m.MentionedUserIds[id] {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @user with \"@here @user\"")
|
||||
} else if len(potential) > 1 {
|
||||
} else if len(m.OtherPotentialMentions) > 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("should've potential mentions for @potential")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestRemoveCodeFromMessage(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
input := "this is regular text"
|
||||
expected := input
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with\n```\na code block\n```\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with\n```javascript\na JS code block\n```\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with\n```java script?\na JS code block\n```\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with an empty\n```\n\n\n\n```\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with an empty\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with\n```\ntwo\n```\ncode\n```\nblocks\n```\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with\n\ncode\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with indented\n ```\ncode\n ```\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with indented\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text ending with\n```\nan unfinished code block"
|
||||
expected = "this is text ending with\n"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `code` in a sentence"
|
||||
expected = "this is in a sentence"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `two` things of `code` in a sentence"
|
||||
expected = "this is things of in a sentence"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `code with spaces` in a sentence"
|
||||
expected = "this is in a sentence"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `code\nacross multiple` lines"
|
||||
expected = "this is lines"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `code\non\nmany\ndifferent` lines"
|
||||
expected = "this is lines"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `\ncode on its own line\n` across multiple lines"
|
||||
expected = "this is across multiple lines"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `\n some more code \n` across multiple lines"
|
||||
expected = "this is across multiple lines"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `\ncode` on its own line"
|
||||
expected = "this is on its own line"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `code\n` on its own line"
|
||||
expected = "this is on its own line"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is *italics mixed with `code in a way that has the code` take precedence*"
|
||||
expected = "this is *italics mixed with take precedence*"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is code within a wo` `rd for some reason"
|
||||
expected = "this is code within a wo rd for some reason"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `not\n\ncode` because it has a blank line"
|
||||
expected = input
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is `not\n \ncode` because it has a line with only whitespace"
|
||||
expected = input
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is just `` two backquotes"
|
||||
expected = input
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "these are ``multiple backquotes`` around code"
|
||||
expected = "these are around code"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
input = "this is text with\n~~~\na code block\n~~~\nin it"
|
||||
expected = "this is text with\n\nin it"
|
||||
if actual := removeCodeFromMessage(input); actual != expected {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("received incorrect output\n\nGot:\n%v\n\nExpected:\n%v\n", actual, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestGetMentionKeywords(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
th := Setup()
|
||||
defer th.TearDown()
|
||||
|
||||
Ссылка в новой задаче
Block a user